2 ms·

I think Cider9986's comment [1] on the OP covers it pretty well. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48700061 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=487000

• poly2it 3mo ago
  I don't understand why a photosensing pixel is meaningfully worse for privacy than the devices we already have. I mean, sure, you might not as easily be able to cover up your camera with tape, but even then a better solution which should be implemented anyway is a physical decoupling. And as I stated above, I doubt this is meaningful for spying capabilities. Micro cameras are likely more suitable, for better or worse.