3 ms·
This is the most credible-seeming claim about why a competent administration might suspend access (by any means necessary, but also by export controls) to model
by wrsh07 4mo ago
This is the most credible-seeming claim about why a competent administration might suspend access (by any means necessary, but also by export controls) to models like Fable
However, I haven't seen any prominent articles proposing this theory, I haven't seen anyone in the administration gesturing towards this as the reason (but haven't been following too closely)
Do you have any sources?
(And in fact, it seemed like an obvious hypothesis that wasn't getting much air time in the first weekend, but again, I didn't see anybody really staking a claim to it except in a few comments or tweets like this one)
- K0balt 4mo agoI doubt an administration would openly admit to sabotaging the ability for companies and individuals to safeguard their products against cyberattacks from the US government lol. That’s pretty much taking the mask all the way off. It’s the only motive I have seen that aligns with the actual scenario, and if I -did- have inside information I certainly would not be at liberty to cite it publicly lol.
- wrsh07 3mo agoThe administration hasn't been so good at keeping the mask on but fair! Was hoping someone else had proposed it though. It's a good thought
- 2001zhaozhao 3mo ago+1, this is a good thesis. It's plausible and if it's true, then that explains the opaqueness of this whole ordeal and why it's been applied to both OpenAI and Anthropic models now.