5 ms·
Well, nice, really nice idea. Tried it and was frustrated by the poor quality, of the screenshot it produced. Grainy and blurred fonts, nothing I would wanna us
by sdoering 14y ago
Well, nice, really nice idea. Tried it and was frustrated by the poor quality, of the screenshot it produced. Grainy and blurred fonts, nothing I would wanna use.
And the software had obvious problems parsing my css-styles. Some headlines were way of...
Hope you might be able to fix these issues. If not, you are (at least in my case) not usable...
- kimura 14y agoThank you for the feedback. We might have to start generating .png outputs - that will definitely solve the quality problem. Do you mind sharing the site/input you used?
- carbuncle 14y agoYou should add a loader, or at least a feedback that the processhas started. I clicked on the button 2 or 3 times before realizing that my browser was waiting for your side. Plus, the PNG doe not perfectly reflect our site (alignment problems , ...). Input site : http://d-sight.com http://d-sight.com Finally, clicking on our screenshot brings us to "realtywarp.com" Other wise it's a nice tool-to-have. I would probably use it around once a month.