3 ms·

People just submitted it. I don't know why. They "trust me". Dumb fucks.

• username135 4mo ago
  ^
• alex1138 4mo ago
  Oh no, but he was "making a point". Or he was young. He was "right" that it's bad to give up your info (so Zuck hammered home the point by scraping email contacts and using it to populate People You May Know. for your own good) You didn't hear that out of Myspace or Friendster or anyone else that's trusted with information Minimum threshold should be "People should be less forgiving of just giving away credentials but now that I have them I'll protect them with my life". Oh well. Apparently I'm just an idiot He was just joking just like he was joking when he said he'd "fuck the Winklevosses in the ear"
  • nullbio 4mo ago
    Of course, we all make mistakes. Just like when he accidentally made a free VPN to spy on peoples traffic. Sorry bros, networking malfunction!
  • menloshark 4mo ago
    If you like him so much, you should go work for him. Then call us back
    • alex1138 4mo ago
      What? Sorry, how much more sarcasm should I have in one post? It's clear that I don't like what he did And sometimes I outright wasn't being sarcastic. But my point was some people say "he was right for saying that". But you don't hear that from literally anyone else. Google doesn't say it. Banks don't say it. The minimum threshold as I said in my comment was "I'll defend personal info" even if you think people theoretically shouldn't give it a way. But Zuck for example has been known to password scrape The whole comment was about me not liking him
      • menloshark 4mo ago
        look, he's bad, don't work for him, just burn this into your memory, it's not that complicated
      • nullbio 4mo ago
        I thought it was pretty obvious that your post was sarcasm, fwiw. I think people just skimmed it.