3 ms·
Shouldn't the title be "WiFi strength visualized" instead of invisible signals caught on Camera? Its a cool visualization nonetheless, but the title is a littl
by rwbt 14y ago
Shouldn't the title be "WiFi strength visualized" instead of invisible signals caught on Camera?
Its a cool visualization nonetheless, but the title is a little misleading.
- victoro 14y agoThe title of the original article is "Invisible WiFi Signals Caught on Camera." I thought "Invisible" was too Ripley's-Believe-It-Or-Not-sounding so I removed it while trying to keep as much of the original title as possible intact. Probably a better title would have been "WiFi Signal Strength Caught on Camera" or the one you proposed, but, whats done is done.
- javert 14y agoI think the title of the original was being criticized (righly), not the title you chose for the HN post.
- goggles99 14y agoHow about "Cancer risk of your children visualized" ???
- sigkill 14y agoI second your motion. Initially I thought that they found a new material that is sensitive to 2.4GHz electromagnetic waves. This train of thought was inspired by the ability of cameras today to capture infrared light. [The old point remote at camera trick].