4 ms·
This was copying many screens, composing layouts and many strings. not a "general look and feel" or one off utility string. Others found parts of the code copie
by scosman 3mo ago
This was copying many screens, composing layouts and many strings. not a "general look and feel" or one off utility string. Others found parts of the code copied (exact variable names). It would take a court to decide, but I think it's pretty clear cut copyright violation. They gave their agent had access to the EE code, and seemingly asked it to produce a copy. It's not a 1:1 copy, but there was a lot of copying. No clean-room attempt was even made.
If I take the first chapter of Harry Potter and write a new ending, it's still copyright violation. They took many parts.
- kube-system 3mo agoIf they did take sufficiently significant parts of copyrightable components, then yes, it would be a copyright violation. I don't think I saw overwhelming evidence of that in the OP, but certainly there is more to the story.