3 ms·
That's my point too. If you take GLM and call it ChatGPT or Claude Opus is anyone going to notice? If you are not into agentic AI I would argue that the model
by _pdp_ 3mo ago
That's my point too.
If you take GLM and call it ChatGPT or Claude Opus is anyone going to notice? If you are not into agentic AI I would argue that the model type makes zero difference for day to day use because GLM 5.2 is hitting the benchmarks hard.
Now for a specialised use case (narrow fields), say cyber, Mythos is possibly better.
- mft_ 3mo agoGotcha. Agree that it's likely that GLM 5.2 could replace Claude/GPT in many easy-to-mid-level tasks. Given there's a (lot of?) uncertainty around the confidentiality of A/O amongst businesses even just looking at adopting Claude/GPT, it will be interesting to see to what extent the (mostly Chinese) open-weight models start to get broad usage.