2 ms·
I asked this question in another thread [1] but I'll ask it in a different way here: If the US continues to limit advanced AI to it's own domestic companies, U
by someguyornotidk 3mo ago
I asked this question in another thread [1] but I'll ask it in a different way here:
If the US continues to limit advanced AI to it's own domestic companies, US companies will have a large unfair advantage over foreign competitors who will no longer able to compete.
Wouldn't it then make sense for governments around the world to start banning or tariffing US products and services to protect their industries?
1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696965 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696965
- jefftk 3mo agoLimiting exports of AI services to all foreigners is probably allowed under GATS, since there's no favoring one county over another. But even then there's a national security exemption, which fits reasonably well with US arguments here. If a country thought the AI export restrictions were inconsistent with treaty the remedy is challenging them, not unilaterally imposing their own tariffs. But even if they got a favorable panel decision the US would speak, and the Appellate Body is non-functional because the US stopped consenting to the addition of new members and all the terms expired. Which means anything that gets appealed is frozen indefinitely waiting for the AB to reach a quorum that won't come until the US changes is mind (and Biden didn't reverse Trump's decision here).
- beaker52 3mo agoHe gotcha: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4rd71411ko https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn4rd71411ko Trump threatens 100% tariff on European nations over tech tax