4 ms·
That's really nice. Even with your limitations you have things I don't, for example quoting and booleans. There's a part of me that thinks your comparisons sh
by stevekemp 4mo ago
That's really nice. Even with your limitations you have things I don't, for example quoting and booleans.
There's a part of me that thinks your comparisons should return "Nil" on failure rather than "False", but it also seems logical to do it your way too!
I hope you stick with it :)
- phyzix5761 4mo agoYeah, thats a good observation. I wanted to keep the Python types like True, False, and None since its built for Python. That made more sense to me so that users could easily embed it into their Python scripts.
- bsder 4mo agoThat's a Lisp vs Scheme kind of thing. Also, being able to take the cdr of an empty list is a Lisp vs Scheme thing.