3 ms·
> This is exactly what they’ve been asking for. This doesn't directly follow from the first part of your comment, and more importantly seems inaccurate with re
by vinay427 3mo ago
> This is exactly what they’ve been asking for.
This doesn't directly follow from the first part of your comment, and more importantly seems inaccurate with respect to Anthropic's public statements on this situation. For example:
> As we have stated publicly, we believe the government should have the ability to block unsafe deployments, as part of a statutory process that is transparent, fair, clear, and grounded in technical facts. This action does not adhere to those principles.
https://www.anthropic.com/news/fable-mythos-access https://www.anthropic.com/news/fable-mythos-access
- andsoitis 3mo agoTech companies have routinely outmaneuvered the slow machinations of regulatory bodies.
- jandrewrogers 3mo agoIn fairness, they are up against a part of government that can move swiftly and authoritatively. They don’t have the luxury of biding time against a sclerotic and process-bound bureaucracy. There is a good reason no one seriously tests the resolve of these particular regulatory authorities.
- Chyzwar 3mo agoWhat they wanted is to regulate competition but they forgot that current admin is Trump. They should have buy gifts to Trump preferably gold and pay for few exciting dinners in Florida. They should have learned from Bezos and Cook.