4 ms·
That's always been a relative, rather than absolute statement. Genuine question: if Democrats take power, do you expect them to be more interventionist or less
by paytonjjones 4mo ago
That's always been a relative, rather than absolute statement.
Genuine question: if Democrats take power, do you expect them to be more interventionist or less interventionist with respect to AI? Bernie's jockeying leads me to suspect "more", but I could very well be wrong.
(FWIW I personally think modern AI falls in the small realm of potentially dangerous technologies that merit careful, ideally bipartisan, government oversight)
- brokencode 4mo agoI think they’d try to get something through Congress to regulate the industry in a rules-based way. The current admin flies by the seat of their pants and at least creates the perception of political decision making.
- FireBeyond 4mo ago> the perception of political decision making The what? More like "the whims of an eighty year old in cognitive decline and those wishing to curry or keep his favor" - quite an expansive definition of "political decision making".
- dualvariable 4mo agoDon't forget the blatant grift and corruption.
- Alupis 4mo ago> More like "the whims of an eighty year old in cognitive decline..." The previous administration was totally not exactly what's described here...
- preg_match 4mo agoIt wasn’t. Biden largely didn’t do much. The trump administration does illegal things that get struck down in courts on a daily basis. We’re all very desensitized to it. But yes, Biden was old and cognitively not well. But his “whims” didn’t exist much, and they were always fairly reasonable. Trump is the most unreasonable president, most likely in US history. I would even categorize Andrew Jackson as more restrained.
- Alupis 4mo agoThe courts struck down many Biden policies as well. People just give those a pass because "SCOTUS is rigged" or something...
- amanaplanacanal 4mo agoThe only big one I remember is the college loan forgiveness thing.
- Alupis 4mo ago> https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-dealt-biden-historic-series-defeats-2025-01-18/ https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-supreme-court-dealt-bide... That would be your politics coloring your memory.
- amanaplanacanal 4mo agoActually I probably just wasn't paying that much attention.
- the_gastropod 4mo agoAh, so those weren’t mostly 6-3 decisions along partisan lines?
- ThunderSizzle 4mo agoObamacare, but for AI, where every American has to now pay a penalty to not use AI or something like that? That was the last major thing the Democrats did, and healthcare has gotten substantially worse...but at least it's well regulated now.
- boc 4mo agoThe IRA and the CHIPS Act were the "last major thing" the Dems did, and both were far better policy for tech than anything out of this current administration.
- brokencode 4mo agoThat’d land better as a political hit if only it made any sense at all. Truly a low effort attempt.
- tick_tock_tick 4mo ago> I think they’d try to get something through Congress to regulate the industry in a rules-based way. Is that a joke? We're back in a spat with Iran because Obama refused to engage with Congress, as required by our constitution, to enter the USA in any binding deal. Any AI actions from the next admin is going to be executive yolos.
- drdaeman 4mo agoWhat rules, though? Bernie and AOC (which aren't DNC mainstream, but prominent) had just pushed for a moratorium on "AI data centers" with a definition that includes "that are used for the development or operation of AI models at scale" (trivially sidesteppable by "we build this GPU farm to sell to whoever bids for compute" - which is actually true), plus a bunch of fancy extras bundled in like "The government must review and approve AI products before they are released to ensure that AI products are safe and effective.", while lacking actual definition of "AI" (given that we had "AI" systems since '50s). Here's the full text: https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AI-Data-Center-Moratorium.-FINAL-Text.pdf https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/AI-Data-Ce... Yeah, the bill has a cause - it recognizes some pain points. But then it haphazardly tries to address symptoms instead of underlying issues (environmental regulations, utility pricing, land use, job security), while pushing vaguely defined regulations that allow arbitrary application. As if misdirected measures and poorly defined laws aren't already a giant issue.
- brokencode 4mo agoThe whole point of Congress is to get a bunch of people with different ideas and hash them out. Ideas like this are an input, not an output, of Congress.
- drdaeman 4mo agoThat’s how it should be. I’m not sure that’s how it works in practice. Certainly not today, when everything seems to be slogan/agenda-driven.
- polski-g 4mo agoCongress did regulate weapons access when they passed the AECA almost 50 years ago. The rules have been refined via ITAR over time. This isn't arbitrary.
- 4lx87 4mo agoWe don’t have to guess. Democrats had a pragmatic policy under Biden — which was rescinded by Trump when he took office. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/10/30/fact-sheet-president-biden-issues-executive-order-on-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence/ https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statement...
- andsoitis 4mo ago> Democrats had a pragmatic policy under Biden How well does it stand up to Mythos?
- 4lx87 4mo agoHard to imagine it would be worse than Republicans, who don’t have any policy except for the whims of a man child.
- JPKab 4mo agoMarc Andreesen has first-hand knowledge that absolutely refutes what you are saying. The Democratic party is more anti-ai than the Republican party and unfortunately both of them are increasingly responding to astroturfed populism. Do you think Bernie Sanders in AOC are pro-ai? Are you kidding me? Have you seen what they say and the legislation they propose?
- preg_match 4mo agoYes, but they’re proposing legislation. Trump is legislating from the White House, through a series of bribes and corrupt conduct. Not even on the same playing field. They just can’t be compared, they’re incomparable.
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- kristopolous 4mo agoLess. They'd use congress and the courts.