3 ms·
enforce that law Califoria would not be a sanctuary state if they actually cared about enforcing laws.
by userbinator 4mo ago
enforce that law
Califoria would not be a sanctuary state if they actually cared about enforcing laws.
- wat10000 4mo agoWhy would a state enforce federal law?
- WillPostForFood 4mo ago[flagged]
- wat10000 4mo agoLawsuits are part of the law, not thwarting the law. Refusing notifications and holds is inaction, the opposite of “actively.”
- WillPostForFood 4mo agopedantic. You can use lawsuits, within the law, to thwart the law. You can do it knowing you will lose, just to cause delays, like Califorinia and the 9th circuit are ACTIVELY doing to slowdown gun control cases from reaching the supreme court where they 100% will be struck down. Refusing notification is an action.
- wat10000 4mo agoIf you see someone speeding and you don’t report it to the police, does that mean you are ACTIVELY thwarting the law?
- Joker_vD 4mo agoThe US legal system never ceases to amaze me. Why indeed should a state enforce a law? Like, one of those anti-discrimination laws?
- wat10000 4mo agoWhy should it enforce a law from a separate sovereign entity, is the question. And the answer is, it shouldn’t. I don’t think states do, or should, enforce federal anti-discrimination laws. The feds do that. The states pass their own anti-discrimination laws if they want something to enforce themselves.
- amanaplanacanal 4mo agoHistorically, the states never would have come together to create the United States if they had to give up all of their own sovereignty. The constitution is full of compromises.