4 ms·

You live in a touristy area because you have a tourism-related job, right? Because where are the tourists supposed to stay if there's no hotels?

watwut 4mo ago
Or, he did something else and mived away, vecause this sucked. There is never shortage of hotels. They pop up is actual econony supports it. No reason to take bribes
- ozim 4mo ago
  For anyone who was poor in that area it was better to move out.
ozim 4mo ago
Not really. I was just born there and it wasn’t as touristy when I was a child. It blew up as touristy place when I was a teenager and in my twenties. My parents had odd jobs, construction, chemical processing operations. There was some small scale industry running there as well but it went bust when people wanted fresh air for tourism. Even if the industry was really small scale for marketing sake local government got rid of all of it. I also don’t live there anymore as I wrote „I was living in a touristy area”. If I would stay there, there was no future for me there.
- TurdF3rguson 4mo ago
  [flagged]
  - KennyBlanken 4mo ago
    You need to take a break from the keyboard. You're being an asshole.
    - TurdF3rguson 4mo ago
      [flagged]
      - defrost 4mo ago
        The guidelines ask that curious conversation be pursued, drilling into straw guesses about fellow commenters motivations be eschewed. Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. ~ https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        TurdF3rguson 4mo ago
        Pointing out that it's normal for hotels to be built in touristy areas is not snarky.
        defrost 4mo ago
        > your childhood home became more touristy and you're trying to blame somebody for that. Do you know this person or are you just making up a narrative and writing a stranger into it?
        TurdF3rguson 4mo ago
        Are you following this thread at all? That's OP's description of the events. The "trying to blame somebody" is the only editorial I made, and it stems from: - OP's belief that hotel construction is connected to shadowy back-room deals with local officials - Hotels having weird discriminatory hiring practices based on minimum distance from hotel to applicant's house Yeah, it's weird. And I didn't invent it. I don't think it's snarky to point out that those beliefs are overly conspiratorial and that those things can be better attributed to basic economics. Maybe you do and that's fine because you're entitled to your opinion.
  - ozim 4mo ago
    Well not really. I couldn’t care less. I would move out anyway. I just have seen firsthand how people who claim to be „for the local community” on the posters when it is election time — doing exactly the opposite otherwise.

watwut 4mo ago

Or, he did something else and mived away, vecause this sucked. There is never shortage of hotels. They pop up is actual econony supports it. No reason to take bribes

ozim 4mo ago
For anyone who was poor in that area it was better to move out.

ozim 4mo ago

Not really. I was just born there and it wasn’t as touristy when I was a child. It blew up as touristy place when I was a teenager and in my twenties. My parents had odd jobs, construction, chemical processing operations. There was some small scale industry running there as well but it went bust when people wanted fresh air for tourism. Even if the industry was really small scale for marketing sake local government got rid of all of it. I also don’t live there anymore as I wrote „I was living in a touristy area”. If I would stay there, there was no future for me there.

TurdF3rguson 4mo ago
[flagged]
- KennyBlanken 4mo ago
  You need to take a break from the keyboard. You're being an asshole.
  - TurdF3rguson 4mo ago
    [flagged]
    - defrost 4mo ago
      The guidelines ask that curious conversation be pursued, drilling into straw guesses about fellow commenters motivations be eschewed. Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. ~ https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
      - TurdF3rguson 4mo ago
        Pointing out that it's normal for hotels to be built in touristy areas is not snarky.
        defrost 4mo ago
        > your childhood home became more touristy and you're trying to blame somebody for that. Do you know this person or are you just making up a narrative and writing a stranger into it?
        TurdF3rguson 4mo ago
        Are you following this thread at all? That's OP's description of the events. The "trying to blame somebody" is the only editorial I made, and it stems from: - OP's belief that hotel construction is connected to shadowy back-room deals with local officials - Hotels having weird discriminatory hiring practices based on minimum distance from hotel to applicant's house Yeah, it's weird. And I didn't invent it. I don't think it's snarky to point out that those beliefs are overly conspiratorial and that those things can be better attributed to basic economics. Maybe you do and that's fine because you're entitled to your opinion.
- ozim 4mo ago
  Well not really. I couldn’t care less. I would move out anyway. I just have seen firsthand how people who claim to be „for the local community” on the posters when it is election time — doing exactly the opposite otherwise.