4 ms·
>democracy incentivizes clientelism and tribalism Cite your peer reviewed sources.
by mrtesthah 4mo ago
>democracy incentivizes clientelism and tribalism
Cite your peer reviewed sources.
- Saline9515 4mo agoThis is a good intro by recognized researchers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dictator%27s_Handbook https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dictator%27s_Handbook If you want me to be more precise, I would say that clientelism and tribalism are especially rewarded for politicians in a multi-ethnic society. Also a good definition: https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/clientelism/E23ABE885BA3D5DF0D3ABD1260D492D0 https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/clientelism/E23ABE88...
- zimpenfish 4mo ago"Michael C. Moynihan reviewing the book for The Wall Street Journal stated that the writing style is similar to that of Freakonomics." Ouch. If someone said that about a book I'd written, I would simply move to a forest and never write a single word again. Quite the damning review.
- Saline9515 4mo agoI told you that it was an intro. Here is the more serious book, by the same authors: https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/2425/The-Logic-of-Political-Survival https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/2425/The-Logic-of-Pol... And there is nothing wrong with vulgarization, aside from comments from pedantic HNers.
- zimpenfish 4mo ago> And there is nothing wrong with vulgarization My comment wasn't about vulgarisation - it was about Freakonomics' loose approach to rigour and consequent debunking of, IIRC, most of the book. A quick search for "Bruce Bueno de Mesquita" throws up similar debunkings[0] and yeah, I'll not be reading his books after seeing how grandiose his claims are compared with the actuality of what happened. [0] Including one which recommends Dan Ariely - somewhat awkward nowadays.