6 ms·
“ Terra has competitive performance to GPT‑5.5 [while being 2x cheaper]…” To me that means “it’s an inferior product but marketing dictates we try and hide tha
by ComputerGuru 3mo ago
“ Terra has competitive performance to GPT‑5.5 [while being 2x cheaper]…”
To me that means “it’s an inferior product but marketing dictates we try and hide that.”
And “our most robust safety stack to date. We strengthened protections for higher-risk activity, sensitive cyber requests, and repeated misuse, and spent multiple weeks finding weaknesses, pressure-testing our system, and hardening it against real-world attacks” is of zero value to me at best, and most likely to my detriment (increasing refusals or nerfing utility). Why do providers keep leading with that? Are there customers (besides support ChatGPT chatbot users, maybe??) that ask for this?
- goobatrooba 3mo agoMaybe that message is for investors.
- typpo 3mo ago>> Terra has competitive performance to GPT‑5.5 [while being 2x cheaper]… > To me that means “it’s an inferior product but marketing dictates we try and hide that.” I interpret this to mean you're about to get today's mainline performance at a fraction of the price.
- adithyareddy 3mo agoIf that was the case they would have said "equals" or "matches". Instead they say "competitive", as in win-some lose-some.
- dakolli 3mo agoIts just lies by OpenAI dude, these people are just trying to IPO so they can buy a 100m yacht.
- dcre 3mo agoThat message is obviously aimed at the government. See the other thread.
- beering 3mo agoThe point of Terra is to be cheaper than the best model while being pretty good. Of course it’s inferior in intelligence.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- ComputerGuru 3mo agoThe best model is 5.6-sol; they are comparing to 5.5 here.