4 ms·
One wonders why this was flagged. It appears to be a high quality and non-combative analysis of how we were able to advance vaccine development so quickly witho
by BugsJustFindMe 4mo ago
One wonders why this was flagged. It appears to be a high quality and non-combative analysis of how we were able to advance vaccine development so quickly without losing safety or efficacy?
- daveguy 4mo agoBecause there a bunch of social media deluded asshats that want to argue about it in bad faith. See also: "Fauci caused COVID" Unfortunately social media deluded asshats is the prevailing theme of the United States on this 250 year anniversary. See also: "Trumpty Dumpty somehow isn't a corrupt incompetent fraud." The nice way to put it: this has, unfortunately, become a political lightning rod.
- alex1138 4mo agoIt's not bad faith
- pseudohadamard 4mo agoWhat @daveguy said, it talks about Covid and vaccines, two conspiracy-theory hot buttons so of course it'll get flagged the minute it's posted. If you also throw in Epstein, Soros, and Hunter Biden's laptop it'll practically make it self-flagging.
- BugsJustFindMe 4mo agoThere should be a rule against flagging articles without looking at them first based purely on an uneducated guess using only the title. :/