3 ms·
This contradicts your earlier statement, "we had one opening, but five or even ten excellent final candidates," and ignores the criticism: "is it me or is is it
by Cpoll 3mo ago
This contradicts your earlier statement, "we had one opening, but five or even ten excellent final candidates," and ignores the criticism: "is it me or is is it you?"
Although I suppose you're saying that promising candidates are kept on file for later?
- steveklabnik 3mo agoI will be honest, I do not understand what you're saying. It's possible I just need more coffee.
- Cpoll 3mo ago> If [the job applicant materials] didn't get you in the first time, they won't the next time > we had one opening, but five or even ten excellent final candidates Under my interpretation , these statements contradict each other. The former implies that a candidate's failure is always the result of their shortcomings. The latter implies that a qualified candidate can be edged out through little fault of their own. The parent poster complained of exactly this; they weren't sure whether they were ineligible or simply edged out.