3 ms·
> It's really interesting that someone can know all of these domestic Chinese names and yet declare the industry generally a "smoking ruin". They're different
by re-thc 3mo ago
> It's really interesting that someone can know all of these domestic Chinese names and yet declare the industry generally a "smoking ruin".
They're different things. Just like you can be the most famous actor or singer and still be poor. Being popular, having good products and actually making money is not the same.
And it's all relative. Today if NASDAQ dropped 20% the world would declare it in ruins. Are the companies still "alive"? Yes.
> Because anyone who used these companies' products in China would see a pretty large ecosystem that's making a lot of money.
Not true. A lot of them e.g. the public listed 1s have reported increased competition and reduced margins.
- dantillberg 3mo ago> if NASDAQ dropped 20% If NASDAQ dropped 20%, it would have returned to the level last seen three months ago, in March 2026. Calling that "in ruins" would be a pretty big stretch.
- LastTrain 3mo agoYet that is how it would be described if it dropped 20%
- nixon_why69 3mo agoTo pick one example, OP talked about meituan like they haven't seen multiple meituan delivery riders per block every time they take a walk. It strains credibility. Why do they even know the name if they don't see that? Its not like they operate in America.
- re-thc 3mo ago> Why do they even know the name if they don't see that? We're in the age of the Internet. You don't have to be physically there to see anything. They could have just read it on the news, saw social media videos, etc?
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- nixon_why69 3mo agoOk, but it's still weird to know one thing about all of these companies and all of those single things add up to a narrative. I would be questioning my media sources if that was the knowledge I was fed.