4 ms·
True, still, careless on Vice's behalf none the less. You'd think Vice would have some interest in protecting sources, I can remember them trying to pass for 'j
by alexanderh 14y ago
True, still, careless on Vice's behalf none the less.
You'd think Vice would have some interest in protecting sources, I can remember them trying to pass for 'journalism' at least a few times.
Why doesnt Vice's website CMS strip exif data from public facing images? Seems stupid. Sites like Imgur.com get this right.
- jonny_eh 14y agoAnd yet people complain that imgur strips exif data.
- pyre 14y agoStriping all exif data is maybe a little extreme, but striping most might not be that bad (i.e. create a white list of tags, things like rotation, etc). That said, in a case like this, it would make more sense to strip it all (maybe replace it with a copyright notice or something).
- jarin 14y agoMost likely whoever posted it just didn't know about it.