3 ms·
The author states that they are not a lawyer, which is all good and okay. However, immediately afterwards they seem to claim that they know the law better than
by collinfunk 3mo ago
The author states that they are not a lawyer, which is all good and okay. However, immediately afterwards they seem to claim that they know the law better than GNU, the FSF, and their lawyers. It confuses me how the author does not see that as a problem.
- basch 3mo agodoesnt mean the lawyers arent wrong. the lawyer stance is to err on the side of caution even if wrong.