This article is a year old (minus two weeks). Given that the Verge is only 13 months old (according to WP), i.e. it is NINE TIMES OLDER than it was when TFA we

This article is a year old (minus two weeks). Given that the Verge is only 13 months old (according to WP), i.e. it is NINE TIMES OLDER than it was when TFA went to press, this is probably a germane fact that should be mentioned in the HN title? Maybe it's silly to post meta-reviews that are obsolete by now, unless some kind of meta-meta-review is implied?