3 ms·
One issue I keep seeing with cost comparisons is that they compare API rates while a substantial fraction of users are on subscription plans. It's more expensi
by Zak 4mo ago
One issue I keep seeing with cost comparisons is that they compare API rates while a substantial fraction of users are on subscription plans.
It's more expensive to use GLM 5.2 paying z.ai or Opencode Zen API rates than it is to use Opus on a subscription plan. Both of those providers offer subscriptions priced favorably relative to their API rates, but only in what are effectively trial sizes.
- 1matin 4mo agoAnd that means either: 1. They overprice their APIs to make their subscriptions look reasonable 2. They burn money with their subscriptions
- Zak 4mo agoCould be a little of each, plus a third option: subscription users don't always consume their entire quota.
- cherryteastain 4mo agoEnterprise plans don't have the equivalent of the subsidized-usage-included Claude Max/ChatGPT Pro plans anymore. The revenue generated and total amount of tokens used by individuals is probably a tiny fraction of tokens billed at API pricing.