3 ms·
You might want to read it again, then: https://opensource.org/license/mit https://opensource.org/license/mit
by moralestapia 4mo ago
You might want to read it again, then:
https://opensource.org/license/mit https://opensource.org/license/mit
- codingdave 4mo agoThat is about the software, not the data.
- moralestapia 4mo agoWhile a literal reading of the MIT license refers to "software", many datasets have been released under it. In particular, if someone releases something that is only a dataset along with an MIT license file, the most reasonable interpretation is that the rights holder intended to release the data under the terms of that license. I looked for copyright cases involving this specific distinction, whether "data" versus "software" makes a legal difference, but didn’t find anything. So the question remains open (for you, for me it's pretty clear the dataset is released under MIT). You might want to sue and find out. It sounds like an interesting experiment.
- nairboon 4mo agoWhat exactly is released under MIT license?