3 ms·
I say the machine should always be easily overridable, and the human always held responsible for the consequences of their operation of their machine. If you'r
by blooalien 4mo ago
I say the machine should always be easily overridable, and the human always held responsible for the consequences of their operation of their machine. If you're driving a normal car, and you get in an accident, and the accident is your fault and not the fault of another driver, then it's you that pays the price of that accident one way or another. If the machine has some sort of "brain" like "full self-driving" or "driver assist", then that should be easily and instantly overridable and the human should always stay at least as aware of their surroundings as they would in a standard more traditional non-self-driving car and always be on the ready to take over control of the machine at a moment's notice. Same thing as with old-school "cruise control". You still gotta be ready to speed up or slow down under manual control, and / or disengage cruise mode entirely if necessary. No different for FSD IMHO.
- SigmundA 3mo agoThe machine is easily overridable by disabling FSD... Modern cars will auto brake if sensors detect what it thinks is an imminent collision regardless of accelerator position: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_emergency_braking_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_emergency_braking_sy... Traction control systems will cut power if wheel slip is detected again regardless of accelerator position: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traction_control_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traction_control_system FSD is obviously very different than normal cruise control and I cannot see an argument why a system that knows its heading down a dead end street at more than double the posted speed limit would allow such and accelerator override and not apply automatic emergency braking, it makes no sense, that serves no purpose while leading to a tragic outcome.