4 ms·

The content of the post deemed by ICE to warrant federal prosecution crime-boss-style intimidation: > BREAKING: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Goo

The content of the post deemed by ICE to warrant ~~federal prosecution~~ crime-boss-style intimidation: > BREAKING: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in broad daylight has been identified as Jonathan Ross by the Minnesota Star Tribune. I think today is a great day for Johnathan to be indicted! If anyone is wondering, it would still be a good day : )

laweijfmvo 4mo ago
I don’t read the Minnesota Star and hadn’t seen any of this, so, if anything the Feds doxxed their own by bringing it to my attention.
- skeledrew 4mo ago
  Streisand!
fc417fc802 4mo ago
[flagged]
- sanex 4mo ago
  Ah yes illegal according to those laws handed down by the king.
  - fc417fc802 4mo ago
    Indeed, and your sarcastic attempt to malign his majesty is a clear act of terrorism. I can only hope some federal PATRIOTS pay you a visit ASAP. > politically motivated terrorist acts such as ... civil disorder https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/countering-domestic-terrorism-and-organized-political-violence/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/coun...
- alistairSH 4mo ago
  But she didn't dox him - per the quote above, the Minnesota Star released his name. She simply restated what was reported. And that's before we consider the absurdity of making the names of federally-sanctioned killers private. They should all be wearing name tags and ID numbers. And she didn't actually do what the agents claimed in their letter to her: “This notice officially informs you that it is unlawful to threaten to assault, kidnap, and/or murder a federal official or that federal official’s immediate family member with the intent to impede, intimidate, and/or interfere with the federal official’s duties or retaliate against a federal official due to the performance of their duties." She did none of the above. She only said "This is his name. Would be nice if he was indicted." That's not a threat - she's not in a position to indict him or sway a DA towards indictment. His family wasn't mentioned. There was no impeding of his work,
- conartist6 4mo ago
  I'm having a hard time reading your sarcasm level here so I'm going to assume its around 85%.
  - fc417fc802 4mo ago
    Yeah I'm pretty disappointed in the HN readership here. Anyone interpreting that as serious needs to stop and reflect on his own mental state I think.
- hightrix 4mo ago
  It is widely reported and posted around the internet that Jonathan Ross murdered Rene Good while acting in official duties as an ICE agent. There is no conspiracy here.
- iAMkenough 4mo ago
  What does “dox” mean in your eyes? Releasing public information?
mattnewton 4mo ago
_in a polling place_ no less
- panny 4mo ago
  Maybe you should ask them for an ID to make sure they belong there.
- axus 4mo ago
  I see they were invited in by the person they wanted to intimidate, so that she wouldn't be alone, and there were no voters present. "Better judgement" would have been to not invite them and to not accept the invitation, but after the fact I could say it's preferable to the alternative. The person who decided to take action against this lady should be fired though.
LightHugger 4mo ago
[flagged]
- conartist6 4mo ago
  You do realize that's a politically motivated account of actions that has never been subjected to any kind of cross-examination. I want a trial to know if this was a murder or a law enforcement action or self-defense. I should not be expected to decide PERSONALLY, I'm supposed to have a justice system that does that.
  - conartist6 4mo ago
    What I heard is that she attempted to drive a way in a direction that would have made no physical contact with the officer, but the vehicle started to slip sideways on ice and travel in the direction of the officer. If this is all true, the officer might likely be acquitted at trial, as the only necessary justification for such force is that the officer have any reason to fear for their life. But THERE SHOULD BE A TRIAL. What I have heard from those who have studied the available forensic evidence is that Renee Good never intended to do anything but drive away, which may or may not have been legal but is not (necessarily) attempted murder, nor alone cause for an instant death penalty. There should be a trial if for no other reason than to clear the name of Renee Good, who you are accusing of a heinous crime
    - felixgallo 4mo ago
      You don't have to 'hear' anything. If you watch the video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNbHlmZVmAw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNbHlmZVmAw for example (0:55), you see that the tires are turned completely away from the murderer, who fires shots directly into her even though he is obviously not in danger of being seriously harmed.
  - LightHugger 4mo ago
    [flagged]

The content of the post deemed by ICE to warrant ~~federal prosecution~~ crime-boss-style intimidation: > BREAKING: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Goo

laweijfmvo 4mo ago

I don’t read the Minnesota Star and hadn’t seen any of this, so, if anything the Feds doxxed their own by bringing it to my attention.

skeledrew 4mo ago
Streisand!

fc417fc802 4mo ago

[flagged]

sanex 4mo ago
Ah yes illegal according to those laws handed down by the king.
- fc417fc802 4mo ago
  Indeed, and your sarcastic attempt to malign his majesty is a clear act of terrorism. I can only hope some federal PATRIOTS pay you a visit ASAP. > politically motivated terrorist acts such as ... civil disorder https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/countering-domestic-terrorism-and-organized-political-violence/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/coun...
alistairSH 4mo ago
But she didn't dox him - per the quote above, the Minnesota Star released his name. She simply restated what was reported. And that's before we consider the absurdity of making the names of federally-sanctioned killers private. They should all be wearing name tags and ID numbers. And she didn't actually do what the agents claimed in their letter to her: “This notice officially informs you that it is unlawful to threaten to assault, kidnap, and/or murder a federal official or that federal official’s immediate family member with the intent to impede, intimidate, and/or interfere with the federal official’s duties or retaliate against a federal official due to the performance of their duties." She did none of the above. She only said "This is his name. Would be nice if he was indicted." That's not a threat - she's not in a position to indict him or sway a DA towards indictment. His family wasn't mentioned. There was no impeding of his work,
conartist6 4mo ago
I'm having a hard time reading your sarcasm level here so I'm going to assume its around 85%.
- fc417fc802 4mo ago
  Yeah I'm pretty disappointed in the HN readership here. Anyone interpreting that as serious needs to stop and reflect on his own mental state I think.
hightrix 4mo ago
It is widely reported and posted around the internet that Jonathan Ross murdered Rene Good while acting in official duties as an ICE agent. There is no conspiracy here.
iAMkenough 4mo ago
What does “dox” mean in your eyes? Releasing public information?

mattnewton 4mo ago

_in a polling place_ no less

panny 4mo ago
Maybe you should ask them for an ID to make sure they belong there.
axus 4mo ago
I see they were invited in by the person they wanted to intimidate, so that she wouldn't be alone, and there were no voters present. "Better judgement" would have been to not invite them and to not accept the invitation, but after the fact I could say it's preferable to the alternative. The person who decided to take action against this lady should be fired though.

LightHugger 4mo ago

[flagged]

conartist6 4mo ago
You do realize that's a politically motivated account of actions that has never been subjected to any kind of cross-examination. I want a trial to know if this was a murder or a law enforcement action or self-defense. I should not be expected to decide PERSONALLY, I'm supposed to have a justice system that does that.
- conartist6 4mo ago
  What I heard is that she attempted to drive a way in a direction that would have made no physical contact with the officer, but the vehicle started to slip sideways on ice and travel in the direction of the officer. If this is all true, the officer might likely be acquitted at trial, as the only necessary justification for such force is that the officer have any reason to fear for their life. But THERE SHOULD BE A TRIAL. What I have heard from those who have studied the available forensic evidence is that Renee Good never intended to do anything but drive away, which may or may not have been legal but is not (necessarily) attempted murder, nor alone cause for an instant death penalty. There should be a trial if for no other reason than to clear the name of Renee Good, who you are accusing of a heinous crime
  - felixgallo 4mo ago
    You don't have to 'hear' anything. If you watch the video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNbHlmZVmAw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNbHlmZVmAw for example (0:55), you see that the tires are turned completely away from the murderer, who fires shots directly into her even though he is obviously not in danger of being seriously harmed.
- LightHugger 4mo ago
  [flagged]