3 ms·
License in question: https://github.com/papermark/papermark?tab=License-1-ov-file https://github.com/papermark/papermark?tab=License-1-ov-file It is AGPL, basic
by blourvim 3mo ago
License in question: https://github.com/papermark/papermark?tab=License-1-ov-file https://github.com/papermark/papermark?tab=License-1-ov-file
It is AGPL, basically means:
You have to share the source code even when the user interacts over the network with the software.
The project which uses that code, must also be AGPL,
There are ways to separate it and go around it, for example, using an AGPL auth server shouldn't affect the code where your business logic lives
I am sure they could have found a way to design their product to be compliant, especially following past drama.
This is assuming the code is indeed copied, since we don't know that for sure, it does look very similar but I am not sure how that is enforced
- rwarren63 3mo agothey probably need to sue to enforce this, I think this is actually going to be a larger issue than just corgi. copyright with these models really is just a mess
- blourvim 3mo agoWhat I don't understand is that if a lawsuit happens, then must the plaintiff produce their source code for verification ? Even so a git tree is trivial to change into some other arbitrary code even if a license violation has occurred. I also heard if proven the consequences are that they would lose all revenue starting from when the violation has occured
- m4rtink 3mo agoJust consider all model output AGPL. ;-)