If you click the link on that where it says "discuss" to the right of "Iranian victory" there's quite a lot of open discussion on whether to say won or inconclu

If you click the link on that where it says "discuss" to the right of "Iranian victory" there's quite a lot of open discussion on whether to say won or inconclusive, with about 2/3 of people going for won. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2026_Iran_war#Iranian_Victory_vs_Inconclusive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2026_Iran_war#Iranian_Vic... I think quite a lot of people calling it biased don't really understand how it works - mostly by that sort of vote amongst the kind of people who went to university so I guess left of the Republican party but not too bad. Not sure how you'd improve it except maybe a Ground News kind of approach of having two views - right wing sources say, left wing say. But then many controversies don't neatly split left-right. Also it's not that locked. I could edit it for example - you need to have 500 edits. And I think anyone can chip in on the "discuss" bit.