3 ms·
is it though? not for time series workloads with billions of rows it isn’t
by efficax 4mo ago
is it though? not for time series workloads with billions of rows it isn’t
- frollogaston 4mo agoMaybe with TimescaleDB?
- efficax 4mo agoi mean sure, but that's a whole other storage engine that uses postgres as the frontend. it's basically another database entirely
- frollogaston 4mo agoNot really, it uses regular Postgres tables and indexes under the hood
- marvinstrauch 3mo ago100% agreed. Had recently a few million rows of stats in a relational DB (not exactly Postgres but it'd be the same) and the table was already way bigger than the same data in a TSDB. And that's just the storage side, before query performance even comes into it.