4 ms·
If we want to keep it objective, one metric can already be calculated based on the user history of the submitter. The spammers profile will be full of unmerged
by newswasboring 4mo ago
If we want to keep it objective, one metric can already be calculated based on the user history of the submitter. The spammers profile will be full of unmerged or abandoned prs. Just based on those statistics beginners might be close to zero rating but spammers would be negative.
Unless I totally missed that people are also making new accounts of each PR.
- xbmcuser 4mo agoPrs are too pad cv's or novice users wanting something and vibe coding it themselves. Jellyfin player repos see a lot these kinds of prs so unlikely to be new users
- okigan 4mo agoOr creating repos that will merge their PR(s).
- csomar 4mo agoCreate lots of fake repos/prs to improve your ratio?
- kajman 4mo agoStars are a really bad metric for quality/popularity but they're something here. I think some sort of impact score when combined with repo age, # contributors, etc would be pretty valuable.