Unfortunately, if it's a municipal endeavor, you will have coloring of the coverage. I don't trust the current political establishment in the US to not turn ne

Unfortunately, if it's a municipal endeavor, you will have coloring of the coverage. I don't trust the current political establishment in the US to not turn newsrooms into pure propaganda machines if public funding is requested. Besides, I don't know if there is much of a point. The current President, at the very least, bungled the release of millions of documents related to his former personal friend who was under investigation/indictment for sex trafficking. The public, for better or worse, just doesn't seem to want to make that a sticking point. If that's not a sticking point, what the hell is? What could a newsroom possibly dig up that could motivate people? And yes, I realize I am being very, very charitable to reducing Trump's possible exposure on Epstein to "bungled the document release", but I think you could at the very least get everyone to agree on that. There was a law passed by Congress, his administration didn't follow it as it had to. Cut and dry.