4 ms·
I studied an ancient form of communing with trees, through treediets (https://sacredtreekeepers.com https://sacredtreekeepers.com) where I had a ~10 day fast wi
by mannanj 4mo ago
I studied an ancient form of communing with trees, through treediets (https://sacredtreekeepers.com https://sacredtreekeepers.com) where I had a ~10 day fast with tree bark tea. there's certainly sentience and life form in them, unlike ours and also able to be connected to, if we have the right modulation of our awareness and sensory experience.
it doesn't just take a psychedelic experience to see this though.
Just because you haven't experienced something, and overely on your intellectual and thinking faculties (because you can't rationalize or understand something with you mind you discount its rights or existence) doesn't mean its true. Edit: I mean we in general overrely on our minds as filters for knowledge, wisdom and understanding when in reality much of knowledge, wisdom and understanding cannot be grasped by the mind or thinking; in many cases the mind deceives & tricks us.
- tsimionescu 4mo agoIf you consumed treebark, then according to your own world view, you willingly tore off pieces of a living, sentient being just in order to see what it feels like. There is simply no way to live, as an animal at least, without doing harm to other living, possibly sentient, beings - and certainly not without killing such. Any moral position that holds that all living beings have an equal right to life is untenable.
- mannanj 4mo agoDo you think that having an equal right to live as any other being must be true in all scenarios, in all cases, and all experiences? i.e. if a tree has that right to equal life, its true all the time through every possibility space of its existence? (same for humans) Or can it be conditionally true in some cases, in some living experiences, and not others?