3 ms·

No paywall at CNBC. > “Today’s Housing News Conference and Signing is hereby cancelled until such time as we pass the desperately needed SAVE AMERICA ACT, whic

by k310 4mo ago

No paywall at CNBC. > “Today’s Housing News Conference and Signing is hereby cancelled until such time as we pass the desperately needed SAVE AMERICA ACT, which I consider to be a National Emergency. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump posted Wednesday, a little over an hour before he was due at the Capitol to sign the bill into law. "Some" call this act the "Suppression And Voter Exclusion" act, otherwise known as Jim Crow. https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/24/trump-cancels-housing-bill-signing-save-america-act.html https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/24/trump-cancels-housing-bill-s...

throwitaway222 4mo ago
[flagged]
- verdverm 4mo ago
  A PAC's own website should have you skeptical of their claims. Their sources in this one are quite low quality. (Grok output... taken seriously? Don't trust any ai output, especially Grok with anything that has political context) However, if we look at what it claims happened, the system we have today is working. The remains no evidence of widespread fraud or any amount that would have changed an outcome.
  - throwitaway222 4mo ago
    Did you see the story of thousands of homeless voters registering and told to vote for $2-5 in LA. The voting fraud is well into the hundreds of thousands of votes in large cities alone. And that's proven. We haven't seen the full scale of it yet. Remember when you all said Nick Shirley was wrong, and it turns out that it was going on for years and many investigations were forcibly closed by Walz and company? The trickle of information may be slow, but I don't recommend closing your eyes, read, make your own opinion about this stuff.
    - verdverm 4mo ago
      > Remember when you all said... You're getting into assuming people belong to some "enemy" group of yours and slinging accusations. Please refrain, I have no idea who this Nick character is. I don't engage in this political theater and propaganda and it is not wanted on HN.
      - throwitaway222 4mo ago
        You're right and I apologize for grouping you. However, if you're going to post that there is no widespread fraud, you have to expect some push back from the groups that don't share the same belief.
        verdverm 4mo ago
        I'm not basing my opinion on faith, no one has provided credible evidence showing widespread fraud and nearly every case that went to court has been thrown out. The internet is full of misinformation these days, be wary. I would encourage you to step back from the left-right fight to recognize it is the people vs the oligarchs. They manipulate us so we are distracted from the robbery they visit upon the country. Both political parties are doing this with the ultra wealthy. This is the fourth cycle this has happened, we are in the phase of excessive inequality, turmoil, and bi-partisanship. Historically, when the wealth gap was smaller, so was bi-partisanship, i.e. we all got along better and made this country greater every day.
        throwitaway222 4mo ago
        It is the people you're choosing as experts to decide for you if the fraud is credible or not is likely the issue. James O'Keefes videos are showing the widespread evidence, the courts are disallowing review of voting records. He was specifically working with the CA government and the FBI after his release and they have since taken down someone responsible for paying for registrations in the thousands. How much further up does it go? We don't know yet. So yes, we ALREADY have evidence of widespread fraud.

by k310 4mo ago

throwitaway222 4mo ago

[flagged]

verdverm 4mo ago
A PAC's own website should have you skeptical of their claims. Their sources in this one are quite low quality. (Grok output... taken seriously? Don't trust any ai output, especially Grok with anything that has political context) However, if we look at what it claims happened, the system we have today is working. The remains no evidence of widespread fraud or any amount that would have changed an outcome.
- throwitaway222 4mo ago
  Did you see the story of thousands of homeless voters registering and told to vote for $2-5 in LA. The voting fraud is well into the hundreds of thousands of votes in large cities alone. And that's proven. We haven't seen the full scale of it yet. Remember when you all said Nick Shirley was wrong, and it turns out that it was going on for years and many investigations were forcibly closed by Walz and company? The trickle of information may be slow, but I don't recommend closing your eyes, read, make your own opinion about this stuff.
  - verdverm 4mo ago
    > Remember when you all said... You're getting into assuming people belong to some "enemy" group of yours and slinging accusations. Please refrain, I have no idea who this Nick character is. I don't engage in this political theater and propaganda and it is not wanted on HN.
    - throwitaway222 4mo ago
      You're right and I apologize for grouping you. However, if you're going to post that there is no widespread fraud, you have to expect some push back from the groups that don't share the same belief.
      - verdverm 4mo ago
        I'm not basing my opinion on faith, no one has provided credible evidence showing widespread fraud and nearly every case that went to court has been thrown out. The internet is full of misinformation these days, be wary. I would encourage you to step back from the left-right fight to recognize it is the people vs the oligarchs. They manipulate us so we are distracted from the robbery they visit upon the country. Both political parties are doing this with the ultra wealthy. This is the fourth cycle this has happened, we are in the phase of excessive inequality, turmoil, and bi-partisanship. Historically, when the wealth gap was smaller, so was bi-partisanship, i.e. we all got along better and made this country greater every day.
        throwitaway222 4mo ago
        It is the people you're choosing as experts to decide for you if the fraud is credible or not is likely the issue. James O'Keefes videos are showing the widespread evidence, the courts are disallowing review of voting records. He was specifically working with the CA government and the FBI after his release and they have since taken down someone responsible for paying for registrations in the thousands. How much further up does it go? We don't know yet. So yes, we ALREADY have evidence of widespread fraud.