There isn't really any irony there; it's a direct consequence of the nature of Anonymous. It's a mistake to attribute any sort of persistent ideology or identi

There isn't really any irony there; it's a direct consequence of the nature of Anonymous. It's a mistake to attribute any sort of persistent ideology or identity to Anonymous, because Anonymous isn't really a persistent movement or organization. It's really just a label that people often choose to adopt when rallying together anonymously over the Internet. There's absolutely nothing stopping people from using the label for whatever hacktivist cause they want to advance. . . but there's also absolutely nothing stopping people from using it for whatever immature or antisocial behavior they want to get involved in.