2 ms·
> if you are a google exec But that’s not who is being discussed. Why create a new topic? If a low-level employee is part of a rescue accused of shooting all
by DANmode 4mo ago
> if you are a google exec
But that’s not who is being discussed. Why create a new topic?
If a low-level employee is part of a rescue accused of shooting all of the dogs, that’s just another day.
> News will cover it as "Google Exec on Board of Evil Dog Rescue Company" so you extend that repuation risk to Google as well since you are actively employed there
No problem with a standard morality clause in the contract, so they can pull the plug when you embarrass them.
I do have a problem with the idea that I need to check in with my employer every time I take a shit in my personal life.
- altmanaltman 4mo agoIts not a new topic, the same applies for any employee as well. And no that's not just another day from the pov of google. That example was too extreme but even for minor things that can be a security concern etc if they are in active positions like that. Also we are not talking about pooping? Why change the topic?
- DANmode 4mo agoI like your shooting all of the dogs example. That’s why I went with it - yes, a one-of-thousands engineer (or janitor, for that matter) from Google who also headed or even founded a dog shelter that shot all of the dogs is non-news, as far as Google and their legal team are concerned. Same as an employee’s “pooping”. Enforce or enact a morality clause, or explicitly pay me not to do things - beyond that, my business after hours is mine.