3 ms·

Wait, someone paid them for DNS before? It was many FREE DNS services since early 00's, I even will not say nothing about the domain names registrants who almos

Wait, someone paid them for DNS before? It was many FREE DNS services since early 00's, I even will not say nothing about the domain names registrants who almost always (with literally few exceptions) provides free DNS.

sebiw 3mo ago
Domain Registrars usually have shitty, subpar DNS eg. without Anycast or DNSSEC.
- savikko 3mo ago
  If i have understood correctly, Anycast is not feature of DNS but a feature of BGP. Otherwise, that is my observation also.
  - celsoazevedo 3mo ago
    I believe they're referring to the DNS servers. The closer they are to the user, the faster a DNS resolution happens. A good provider will have different locations across the world, and users connect to the nearest datacentre. The free DNS some domain registrars offer is, sometimes, hosted at one single location. If the server is in the US and the user is in Europe, you're adding 80-150ms to requests. If they use "anycast" servers, the user could connect to a server 1-20ms away.
ralish 3mo ago
Uh, paying for DNS isn't uncommon? Examples off the top of my head: - Akamai DNS - AWS Route 53 - Azure DNS - Cloudflare (excluding personal/hobbyist plan) - Google Cloud DNS And many, many others. And I note the site you posted this comment on is using Route 53, so probably paid as I doubt their query volume would be in the free tier. Paying for DNS for personal/hobby stuff is probably pretty uncommon, because like you say, most domain registrars will offer it for free. But commercial websites often will, particularly larger ones with serious traffic.
matja 3mo ago
Amazon Route 53 is $0.40 per million DNS queries - which would terrify me if I used it, considering a typical 10Gbit server connection hosted at a unscrupulous ASN with no egress IP filtering is capable of sending a million DNS requests per second from random spoofed IP addresses.

sebiw 3mo ago

Domain Registrars usually have shitty, subpar DNS eg. without Anycast or DNSSEC.

savikko 3mo ago
If i have understood correctly, Anycast is not feature of DNS but a feature of BGP. Otherwise, that is my observation also.
- celsoazevedo 3mo ago
  I believe they're referring to the DNS servers. The closer they are to the user, the faster a DNS resolution happens. A good provider will have different locations across the world, and users connect to the nearest datacentre. The free DNS some domain registrars offer is, sometimes, hosted at one single location. If the server is in the US and the user is in Europe, you're adding 80-150ms to requests. If they use "anycast" servers, the user could connect to a server 1-20ms away.

ralish 3mo ago

Uh, paying for DNS isn't uncommon? Examples off the top of my head: - Akamai DNS - AWS Route 53 - Azure DNS - Cloudflare (excluding personal/hobbyist plan) - Google Cloud DNS And many, many others. And I note the site you posted this comment on is using Route 53, so probably paid as I doubt their query volume would be in the free tier. Paying for DNS for personal/hobby stuff is probably pretty uncommon, because like you say, most domain registrars will offer it for free. But commercial websites often will, particularly larger ones with serious traffic.

matja 3mo ago

Amazon Route 53 is $0.40 per million DNS queries - which would terrify me if I used it, considering a typical 10Gbit server connection hosted at a unscrupulous ASN with no egress IP filtering is capable of sending a million DNS requests per second from random spoofed IP addresses.