2 ms·
Too bad, because it basically said they only use necessary cookies. I suppose you'd have complained if there were no cookie banner as well? I mean, that cooki
by nottorp 4mo ago
Too bad, because it basically said they only use necessary cookies.
I suppose you'd have complained if there were no cookie banner as well?
I mean, that cookie popup saying there's no need for a cookie popup is probably there because someone complained there's no cookie popup...
- injidup 4mo agoThe "Appreciate it" / "cool carry on" Is exactly the sort of confusing non choice options cookie banners give. Along the lines of "Accept all" / "more information" Then I'll retract my claim but it is bad UX to make a popup on the landing page that looks like an evil cookie banner.
- nottorp 4mo agoI must agree the text on the buttons confused me too, but considering the article title and the first few comments I stopped and read the pop-up text. I’m in the habit of going interesting title -> skim a few comments -> then decide whether I should click on the article