3 ms·
This doesn't seem like a reason not to do address based limiting, just a reason it wouldn't be perfect. Perfect is the enemy of good.
by foobarchu 3mo ago
This doesn't seem like a reason not to do address based limiting, just a reason it wouldn't be perfect.
Perfect is the enemy of good.
- kolinko 3mo agoIf you live in a house you can generate tens of thousands of addresses that will be delivered to you without much problem. You just begin inventing apt. numbers - having up to a thousand apts in a building is not suspicious. And once you cross a thousand, you can invent new buildings by strapping letter names to your home number, so that gives you a-z * 1000 = 24000 unique addresses you can generate easily. Without much hassle you could extend that to a million. Requiring a unique mailing address is just as pointless as a unique email.
- apple4ever 3mo agoBut we have databases of addresses and we can tell if it actually has 1000 apartments.
- ill13 3mo agoWho's updating those db's when I turn my single family in to a tri-plex , then convert it to an 10 unit apartment complex? The answer is "no one".
- Strom 3mo agoThat depends on where you live. In my country the government keeps an up-to-date db. Everything else in the country depends on and queries that db too, so it's not isolated.