3 ms·
Because the vast majority of the codebases in its training set aren't fully type-checked, or very clean at all. Or it's just snippets from Stack Overflow, so th
by ambicapter 4mo ago
Because the vast majority of the codebases in its training set aren't fully type-checked, or very clean at all. Or it's just snippets from Stack Overflow, so there's no existing context to not assume null-checking is valid.