3 ms·
We should be basing public policy on facts not marketing language.
by ninjalanternshk 4mo ago
We should be basing public policy on facts not marketing language.
- Insanity 4mo agoThis assumes that the people in charge for public policy understand the technology beyond the marketing. Which I don’t think is this case based on the track record of policymakers when it comes to essentially any technology.
- altmanaltman 4mo agoAmazon CEO literally told US gov officials that it could be jailbroken and is dangerous. That was a fact (or from the pov of the gov it was). If they were going to ban based on marketing, all LLMs models would have been banned by now.
- Atotalnoob 4mo agoWhy? You can’t yell fire in a crowded place, but “this is going to destroy the world, sign up now” is okay? Most things should be fact based, but you also should have limits to your marketing
- estearum 4mo agoDid Anthropic say "this is going to destroy the world, sign up now"? The details matter quite a lot actually in free speech cases. Should a nuclear energy startup that says "nuclear weapons are very dangerous and should be regulated" be liable to have its assets frozen?