3 ms·
I am willing to concede to “human readable” and dropping “string” iff queries on TIMESTAMP are producing a human readable string (I believe they are … I haven’t
by jagged-chisel 4mo ago
I am willing to concede to “human readable” and dropping “string” iff queries on TIMESTAMP are producing a human readable string (I believe they are … I haven’t been in postgres in at least six weeks and details like that don’t make a lasting impression in muh brain)
- mulmen 4mo agoWhy would queries on TIMESTAMP not produce human readable strings? Postgres has defaulted to a human readable mask for timestamp presentation for at least 25 years. See Current: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-DATETIME-OUTPUT https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-datetime.ht... And 7.1 (2001-04-13): https://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.1/datatype-datetime.html https://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.1/datatype-datetime.html (Section 3.4.2)