4 ms·
If the goal is just to make it work like google3, then hg and jj and sapling can all already achieve this. There’s no need for a new contender here. The differe
by kccqzy 4mo ago
If the goal is just to make it work like google3, then hg and jj and sapling can all already achieve this. There’s no need for a new contender here. The differentiation must come from something else.
But of course at Google the file system part (CitC) is a layer beneath the version control system and is shared across different vcs tools.
- zdgeier 4mo agoI do think hosting is an important part of the VCS story. I agree that hg and jj and sapling are capable of being front ends to a google3 like backend GitHub like thing to support it (Google has this internally for jj). Of course some people are working on hosting solutions for these but it feels wrong to me that hosting platforms and their underlying VCS are not made by the same team. IMO people like google3 so much because it’s one integrated system which is the approach I’m trying with Oak.
- kccqzy 4mo agoWell even at Google the hosting solutions and the VCS are not made by the same team. I lack imagination in thinking how being made by the same team can improve things, but that’s on me. Good luck!
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- adastra22 4mo agoPublic hg and jj are just a front-end to git. No virtual file system overlay or anything like that. Meta has open sourced many of the components of sapling, but there is no plumbing to put it all together in the same configuration.