3 ms·
> We think these are related, just like you do. Oh, we're all well aware that you think hurting people is the only way to improve the country. > The differenc
by solid_fuel 4mo ago
> We think these are related, just like you do.
Oh, we're all well aware that you think hurting people is the only way to improve the country.
> The difference is that you assume that hurting billionaires will improve America while we assume that hurting NGOs and postmodernist academics will do so.
Don't you know that lying is a sin? You can't even define "postmodernist". No. I've heard this screeching noise you're making many times but it always boils down to the same truth: you don't believe in hurting "postmodernist academics", you believe in hurting people who aren't straight, white, christians.
- rayiner 4mo ago[flagged]
- solid_fuel 4mo ago> How about “people who bring intersectional personal attributes into a discussion of science funding?” Yeah, that's what I figured - you are in fact completely incapable of defining "postmodernist". I don't think anyone is surprised that you have no idea what you're talking about though, it's pretty obvious that you're just a really emotionally fragile guy who is having some big feelings about minorities existing. By the way, I know there's no god, because if there was you would have spontaneously imploded from the sheer irony of whining about bringing “intersectional personal attributes into a discussion of science funding” in a post-DOGE world.
- TimorousBestie 4mo ago“By that definition, DOGE was postmodernist” is sincerely great, good job.
- solid_fuel 4mo ago0/10 on reading comprehension, repeat 5th grade. I'm sure that's not the first time you've been told that.