3 ms·
Because they were the only party competent enough to run a PKI (which is 95% policy) while Linux distros still can't agree on a single boot loader. shim didn't
by naturalmovement 4mo ago
Because they were the only party competent enough to run a PKI (which is 95% policy) while Linux distros still can't agree on a single boot loader.
shim didn't exist at first. Linux was planning to go without until Red Hat's hand was forced likely because their paying customers demanded it.
- mjg59 4mo agoIt's actually largely because I demanded it, our customers weren't paying attention at all - Fedora was going to be hit much worse than RHEL