3 ms·
A nuclear reactor in the Alberta Oil sands would take care of a large amount of the CO2 produced in the production of crude.
by mig39 5mo ago
A nuclear reactor in the Alberta Oil sands would take care of a large amount of the CO2 produced in the production of crude.
- _aavaa_ 5mo agoDoesn’t help with the burning part. Or the stranded infrastructure once the demand goes away.
- speed_spread 5mo agoDemand will not go away. There'll be toxic waste to clean up for decades after.
- bonesss 5mo agoNuclear process heat in refining would enable releasing less CO2 per fuel-unit. It doesn’t solve burning directly, but reduces the impact of what is going to happen anyways.
- theeyescanner 5mo ago[flagged]
- bluefirebrand 5mo agoAbsolutely ridiculous that I was down voted and flagged for some mild griping about the state of my province's inability to execute on infrastructure projects, but offhand jokes (I hope it's a joke) about nuking my home is completely fine? :/
- jibal 5mo agoRidiculous whataboutism. What makes you think that anyone thought that it's completely fine? The comment is dead.
- jibal 5mo agoDownvoted? Seriously? It's an objective fact that the comment is dead, which refutes the claim that people thought it's completely fine. And the comment has nothing to do with some totally different claim that was downvoted, thus it is objectively whataboutism, and obviously ridiculous.