3 ms·
Not a metallurgist, but reading https://www.science.org/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1126%2Fscience.aec4995&file=science.aec4995_sm.pdf https://www.science.
by Someone 4mo ago
Not a metallurgist, but reading https://www.science.org/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1126%2Fscience.aec4995&file=science.aec4995_sm.pdf https://www.science.org/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.112..., table S4, page 36, they don’t primarily claim this is extraordinary. They list 20 other “alphabet soup” alloys of, ballpark, similar strength.
Also, FTA: “The real significance is not just this particular alloy, but the demonstration that atoms can self-organise into defect-free structures in a bulk metallic material, meaning a large, continuous piece of metal, not a thin coating, film or microscopic sample”
That PDF also says they had structures of size 30mm × 10mm × 2mm, cold-rolled to be 0,8mm thick. I wouldn’t know whether that’s more “bulk material” than those other papers accomplished.
(Looking at the complex production process, I do not see this getting wide usage soon, even if it scales to car-sized structures)