5 ms·

He was complicit when he knowingly made the choice that would have no accountability.

• bit-anarchist 4mo ago
  That presumes that it's their responsibility to hold them accountable or, at least, that the other option is free. Given that you haven't shown either of those, and the statements point to the contrary, it's fair to say they are not complicit.
  • b40d-48b2-979e 4mo ago
    or, at least, that the other option is free So morals only matter depending on how easy a decision is to make and how it won't affect you personally? This is coming back full circle to "has no morals".
    • bit-anarchist 4mo ago
      > So morals only matter depending on how easy a decision is to make and how it won't affect you personally? I see you cut the first part, only to follow with a "only" qualitative. That's not an honest nor moral thing to do. Specially given you still have to prove their moral obligations about the matter. Saying that they've chosen the risk minimizing option is a non sequitur.