2 ms·
>That whole time, judicial warrants had always been legally and practically adequate for obtaining and reviewing evidence that was physically accessible. Certa
by bondarchuk 5mo ago
>That whole time, judicial warrants had always been legally and practically adequate for obtaining and reviewing evidence that was physically accessible.
Certainly not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secrecy_of_correspondence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secrecy_of_correspondence
- dataflow 5mo agoYou're telling me that in Denmark they can't open your letters even with a judicial order? The Danish constitution also mentions privacy, in the form of paragraph 72 that stipulates that the confiscation and examination of letters and other papers; as well the interception of postal-, telegraph- and telephone communication cannot be done without a judicial order. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_law_in_Denmark https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_law_in_Denmark
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]