7 ms·
UK ISPs block The Promo Bay
- hackerboos 14y agoActually the site works on BT.
- insin 14y agoIt's blocked for me on BT, same message as The Pirate Bay > Error - site blocked
- summerdown2 14y agoBlocked on virgin cable broadband. Sorry, the web page you have requested is not available through Virgin Media. Virgin Media has received an order from the Courts requiring us to prevent access to this site in order to help protect against copyright infringement.
- Angostura 14y agoYes, I'm just trying to work out who at Virgin to contact to find out the details of said Court Order
- shocks 14y agoWe are now on the slippery slope of which there is no return. The minute UK ISPs got the infrastructure in place to block TBP, they got the infrastructure to block any webpage the government want at the touch of a few buttons. Now it's easy to "just block this website as well". The beginning of a censored internet. Fucking wonderful. (Blocked on Be [bethere.co.uk] too, btw.)
- shocks 14y agoThe UK will be the next Denmark. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_Denmark http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_Denmark
- aes256 14y agoThis isn't anything new. Most of the major ISPs in the UK work with the Internet Watch Foundation [1] who maintain a blacklist of sites with certain types of content (child pornography, criminally obscene images, etc.) and have been blocking these for years. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Watch_Foundation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Watch_Foundation
- shocks 14y agoUnderstood, but the point here is that promobay.org doesn't actually link to copyright material or anything else of such a nature. Promobay.org was just banned because it has a weak affiliation to a method of desceminating content, some of which could in certain circumstances be copyright material - but ultimately that is up to the USER and not the website to which promobay is related. Edit: grammar.
- aes256 14y agoWe haven't had official word from any of the ISPs involved. Sounds to me like a mistake, or an excessively cautious response to the prior court order requiring ISPs to block access to TPB. This may be a different domain, and it may be hosted on a different server, but this is inextricably linked to TPB.
- regularfry 14y agoThat's the thing about slippery slopes. You can generally point to any specific instance and say "but this isn't anything new".
- Empro 14y agoWell this just sucks. I wouldn't want to be living in the UK.
- k-mcgrady 14y agoBlocked on TalkTalk too although the message they show is the same as they one they show for the pirate bay (and actually includes TPB's logo).
- jsolson 14y agoHow is the blocking being carried out? For example, if you switch to Google DNS, does that get around the issue?
- gabemart 14y agoI don't know how the blocking is actually being done, but it's not via DNS. I've been using 8.8.8.8 at home and piratebay.org remains blocked.
- sdfjkl 14y agoIP based, so using a different DNS resolver doesn't help.
- barrkel 14y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleanfeed_(content_blocking_system) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleanfeed_(content_blocking_sys...
- Lagged2Death 14y agoSounds like a VPN will completely and invisibly bypass the block. So the filtering will only inconvenience the least sophisticated (and from the point of view of the "content industry," the least scary) violators. It's a plan that might have been drafted by the highest levels of organized piracy, to keep the hoi polloi in their thrall.
- DigitalSea 14y agoThey tried implementing a similar system here in Australia, but recently our Communications Minister Stephen Conroy backed down and instead said they would only block sites related to child abuse only after years of public backlash about the filter. Seeing what has happened in the UK even if it was an accident with The Promo Bay has made me realise that even though a government says it has its peoples interests at heart with a filter, it's all too easy to add a site to a blocklist when it should be a much more complicated and drawn out process that ensures only bad sites get blocked not sites trying to help unsigned artists.
- barrkel 14y agoIt's not the government that expanded filtering use, it was the courts.
- DigitalSea 14y agoWho do you think was responsible for implementing the filter in the first place? The courts may have been responsible for extending it, but there should never have been a filter introduced in the first place to be extended. Filtering has been proven to be very ineffective, expensive and detrimental to an open society. The Internet might have it's grey areas, but filtering doesn't benefit anyone other than the lobbyists acting on behalf of the entertainment industry averse to change.
- barrkel 14y agoI'm saying that governments may be sincere in their motives with censorship, and not betray their motives, but other mechanisms may still pervert and corrupt the implementation. Don't mistake me for someone in favour of filters.
- RobAley 14y ago> instead said they would only block sites related to child abuse Thats how we started here in the UK. It may sound better, but it's simply putting you a bit higher up the slippery slope. We'll see you at the bottom!
- TranceMan 14y agohttp://promobay.org/ http://promobay.org/ is blocked here on Virgin Media, http://thepromobay.co.uk/ http://thepromobay.co.uk/ seems ok - looks legit?
- viraptor 14y agoBoth work on Sky (first one with www. prepended - seems to be a config issue), but the second link looks like just a TPB mirror/proxy - it has the search for torrents mainly. That's something completely different than the first link, which is actually a promotion site.
- d5ve 14y agopromobay.org resolves to 108.59.2.74 for me, and www.promobay.org resolves to 108.59.2.75. The first is blocked for me on Virgin, but the second works fine. This does look like a DNS issue on the part of TPB, rather than Virgin blocking promobay.
- tarkin2 14y agoSky blocks the first, not the second. This is disgusting. It's time to switch ISPs and start helping whoever is fighting this.
- EwanToo 14y agoit might be surprising to find that Talktalk and bt (i think) went to court fighting the original blocking orders, they were very unwilling to implement mandatory blocking
- rmk2 14y agoFunnily enough, this site isn't blocked from within JANET (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JANET https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JANET)
- Osmium 14y agoJANET is still one of those few bastions of sanity. Goodness knows how long that'll last though. Probably until someone notices it's being run sensibly and decides to do something about it.
- rwmj 14y agoIt's not blocked on my UKFSN / Enta connection either. It's possible to get unblocked connections in the UK just fine.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- casca 14y agoThe court has ordered that they block access. Different ISPs have chosen to block this in different ways. Some drop the DNS, some redirect to their own blocking site. Presumably the Pirate Party will add another option to their TPB proxy to show those who are already convinced how stupid this is (https://tpb.pirateparty.org.uk/ https://tpb.pirateparty.org.uk/).
- buro9 14y agoAre you able to cite the court order? I am curious whether a site (and it's many domains) was excluded, a specific list of domains, or "all domains owned by <entity>".
- willdaybleagain 14y agoOoh. Hey guys, Will here - the guy who made the promobay.org app. We started a change.org petition. Not entirely sure what it'll do to help, but hey: http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/stop-bt-virgin-media-and-be-from-blocking-the-promo-bay-let-customers-access-promobay-org http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/stop-bt-virgin-media-a...
- jmillikin 14y ago> We started a change.org petition. Not entirely sure > what it'll do to help "nothing"?
- willdaybleagain 14y agovery possibly. :)
- meaty 14y agoIf you are suffering from this, please switch to a proper ISP such as Andrews and Arnold or newnet plc. Cheap ubiquitous internet connections in the UK are always broken in some way.
- tarkin2 14y agoI'm chomping at the bit to change ISPs, but won't these also be affected?
- meaty 14y agoFor the moment, no. At least Andrews&Arnold have a policy though: http://aaisp.com/news-censorship.html http://aaisp.com/news-censorship.html
- jiggy2011 14y agoIIRC these sites are blocked because of a court order, the ISP has no say and has to comply. Looked at the prices for Andrews and Arnold £25 per month with a download cap of 25GB. I would use that up in under a week.
- meaty 14y agoActually not strictly true. Only the larger named ISPs (larger market share) have to comply. The smaller ISPs do not. +£10 for 100Gb. +£20 for 200Gb. Not particularly expensive and considering it's a proper line, not some screwed up censored telescreen pipe, I'm not fussed.
- jiggy2011 14y agoThey seem to price much higher for daytime use , which is when I would mainly use it (I work from home). 200GB of offpeak and daytime per month would be £332.00. Besides, if everyone just switched to a "proper" ISP then they would be forced into compliance, the same as everyone else.
- 14y ago
- tehwalrus 14y agoneither of these sites is blocked for me, in the UK. I use IDNET - smaller broadband companies don't have to comply with these rulings. Also, well defined usage limits and no throttling! what's not to like? oh, slightly more expensive.
- summerdown2 14y agoFrom Virgin: http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/Chatter/Blocking-of-the-Promo-Bay/m-p/1592746#M2602 http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/Chatter/Blocking-of-the-... Hi I've got our official statement on this: Promobay.org is included on the list of URLs Virgin Media is required to block under UK law following the ruling of the High Court against the Pirate Bay. As a responsible ISP, Virgin Media complies with court orders addressed to the company but strongly believes compelling legal alternatives are needed to give consumers access to great content at the right price. and followed by: Also for the record this site isn't blocked by the IWF, it's a seperate matter caused by the court order against the Pirate Bay.