5 ms·
Headline: "The is minimal downside" Article: "I’m hoping it’s going to be minimal"
by petesergeant 4mo ago
Headline: "The is minimal downside"
Article: "I’m hoping it’s going to be minimal"
- davidpapermill 4mo agoShould be top comment. I think there _are_ downsides to using open models. Quality won't be as good. That's a given, at least with SOTA. But there's more: switching between models means qualitative changes in replies, and in strengths and weaknesses on evals. You're also on the "open source track" and there's no guaranteed upgrade path - the creator may simply stop publishing new models. And the fact that they're mostly from China comes with political, provenance, and governance issues. I think NVIDIA's models are the most promising, because they can serve as a foundation for new model companies. That's a meta-feature that keeps the proprietary models in check. And NVIDIA's incentives are very likely to remain aligned with open-source: they want to encourage competing solutions that rely on their third party hardware.