Is it reasonable to describe this as a “difference of opinion between scientists”? Per the OP article: * it was a Trump political appointee who had made a “sho

Is it reasonable to describe this as a “difference of opinion between scientists”? Per the OP article: * it was a Trump political appointee who had made a “shocking” decision to not even review the vaccine * it was despite the objections of the subject matter experts and career scientists * it was despite the submitted study results being exactly what the FDA had previously approved * the vote to go the opposite direction of him was unanimous I mean sure, you could find an odd scientist who doesn't believe in something that 99.999% of scientists agree on, appoint them as the political head of an agency to overrule the 99.999% of scientists, and call that a “difference of opinion between scientists”, but…